Xeon Gold 5412U vs Athlon 64 X2 TK-53

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon 64 X2 TK-53
2 cores / 2 threads, 31 Watt
0.34
Xeon Gold 5412U
2023
24 cores / 48 threads, 185 Watt
29.55
+8591%

Xeon Gold 5412U outperforms Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 by a whopping 8591% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3296181
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data28.62
Market segmentLaptopServer
Series2x Athlon 64no data
Power efficiency0.476.80
DesignerAMDIntel
Manufacturerno dataIntel
Architecture codenameHawk-256Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Release dateno data10 January 2023 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,113

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 and Xeon Gold 5412U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads248
Base clock speedno data2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed1.7 GHz3.9 GHz
Bus rate667 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data80K (per core)
L2 cacheno data2 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data45 MB
Chip lithography65 nmIntel 7 nm
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data81 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 and Xeon Gold 5412U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
Socketno dataFCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)31 Watt185 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 and Xeon Gold 5412U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 and Xeon Gold 5412U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 and Xeon Gold 5412U are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 and Xeon Gold 5412U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5-4400
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TB
Max memory channelsno data8
ECC memory support-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 and Xeon Gold 5412U.

PCIe versionno data5
PCI Express lanesno data80

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 0.34
Xeon Gold 5412U 29.55
+8591%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 602
Samples: 67
Xeon Gold 5412U 52218
+8574%
Samples: 16

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.34 29.55
Physical cores 2 24
Threads 2 48
Power consumption (TDP) 31 Watt 185 Watt

Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 has 496.8% lower power consumption.

Xeon Gold 5412U, on the other hand, has a 8591.2% higher aggregate performance score, and 1100% more physical cores and 2300% more threads.

The Intel Xeon Gold 5412U is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 in performance tests.

Be aware that Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 is a notebook processor while Xeon Gold 5412U is a server/workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon 64 X2 TK-53
Athlon 64 X2 TK-53
Intel Xeon Gold 5412U
Xeon Gold 5412U

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 10 votes

Rate Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 11 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 5412U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 and Xeon Gold 5412U, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.