Ryzen 5 7640U vs Athlon 64 X2 TK-53

VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon 64 X2 TK-53
2 cores / 2 threads, 31 Watt
0.35
Ryzen 5 7640U
2023
6 cores / 12 threads, 15 Watt
13.35
+3714%

Ryzen 5 7640U outperforms Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 by a whopping 3714% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 and Ryzen 5 7640U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3059563
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Series2x Athlon 64no data
Power efficiency1.0784.23
Architecture codenameHawk-256Phoenix-U (Zen 4) (2023)
Release dateno data3 May 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 and Ryzen 5 7640U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads212
Base clock speedno data3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed1.7 GHz4.9 GHz
Bus rate667 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cacheno data1 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography65 nm4 nm
Die sizeno data178 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistorsno data25,000 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 and Ryzen 5 7640U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
Socketno dataFP8
Power consumption (TDP)31 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 and Ryzen 5 7640U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataRyzen AI, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, SSSE3
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 and Ryzen 5 7640U are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 and Ryzen 5 7640U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon 760M ( - 2600 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 and Ryzen 5 7640U.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 0.35
Ryzen 5 7640U 13.35
+3714%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 558
Ryzen 5 7640U 21210
+3701%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 167
Ryzen 5 7640U 2140
+1181%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 307
Ryzen 5 7640U 8762
+2754%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.35 13.35
Physical cores 2 6
Threads 2 12
Chip lithography 65 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 31 Watt 15 Watt

Ryzen 5 7640U has a 3714.3% higher aggregate performance score, 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads, a 1525% more advanced lithography process, and 106.7% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 5 7640U is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 and Ryzen 5 7640U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon 64 X2 TK-53
Athlon 64 X2 TK-53
AMD Ryzen 5 7640U
Ryzen 5 7640U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 9 votes

Rate Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 39 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 7640U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 or Ryzen 5 7640U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.