i7-11800H vs Athlon 64 X2 TK-53
Aggregate performance score
Core i7-11800H outperforms Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 by a whopping 3569% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 and Core i7-11800H processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 3059 | 602 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Series | 2x Athlon 64 | Tiger Lake |
Power efficiency | 1.07 | 34.72 |
Architecture codename | Hawk-256 | Tiger Lake-H (2021) |
Release date | no data | 11 May 2021 (3 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $395 |
Detailed specifications
Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 and Core i7-11800H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
Threads | 2 | 16 |
Base clock speed | no data | 1.9 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 1.7 GHz | 4.6 GHz |
Bus rate | 667 MHz | 8 GT/s |
L1 cache | no data | 80 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | no data | 1.25 MB (per core) |
L3 cache | no data | 24 MB (shared) |
Chip lithography | 65 nm | 10 nm SuperFin |
Die size | no data | 190 mm2 |
Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 72 °C |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 and Core i7-11800H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
Socket | no data | FCBGA1787 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 31 Watt | 45 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 and Core i7-11800H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 |
AES-NI | - | + |
FMA | - | + |
AVX | - | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Speed Shift | no data | + |
Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
TSX | - | + |
Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
Flex Memory Access | no data | + |
Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
Security technologies
Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 and Core i7-11800H technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | no data | + |
Secure Key | no data | + |
SGX | no data | - |
OS Guard | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 and Core i7-11800H are enumerated here.
VT-d | no data | + |
VT-x | no data | + |
EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 and Core i7-11800H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | no data | DDR4 |
Maximum memory size | no data | 128 GB |
Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 51.2 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel UHD Graphics for 11th Gen Intel Processors |
Quick Sync Video | - | + |
Graphics max frequency | no data | 1.45 GHz |
Execution Units | no data | 32 |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 and Core i7-11800H integrated GPUs.
Number of displays supported | no data | 4 |
Graphics image quality
Maximum display resolutions supported by Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 and Core i7-11800H integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | no data | 4096x2304@60Hz |
Max resolution over eDP | no data | 4096x2304@60Hz |
Max resolution over DisplayPort | no data | 7680x4320@60Hz |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 and Core i7-11800H integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
DirectX | no data | 12.1 |
OpenGL | no data | 4.6 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 and Core i7-11800H.
PCIe version | no data | 4.0 |
PCI Express lanes | no data | 20 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
3DMark06 CPU
3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.
wPrime 32
wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 0.35 | 12.84 |
Physical cores | 2 | 8 |
Threads | 2 | 16 |
Chip lithography | 65 nm | 10 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 31 Watt | 45 Watt |
Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 has 45.2% lower power consumption.
i7-11800H, on the other hand, has a 3568.6% higher aggregate performance score, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 550% more advanced lithography process.
The Core i7-11800H is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 and Core i7-11800H, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.