EPYC 9475F vs Athlon 64 X2 TK-42

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 Turion 64 X2 TL-53 Turion 64 X2 TL-58 Turion 64 X2 TL-62 Turion 64 X2 TL-68
VS
EPYC 9454 EPYC 9454P EPYC 9455 EPYC 9474F EPYC 9475F

Contents

Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 Athlon 64 X2 TK-42
EPYC 9475F EPYC 9475F

Primary details

Comparing Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 and EPYC 9475F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3049not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
Series2x AMD Athlon 64no data
Power efficiency1.70no data
Architecture codenameTyler (2007−2009)Turin (2024)
Release date1 November 2009 (15 years ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$7,592

Detailed specifications

Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 and EPYC 9475F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)48 (Octatetraconta-Core)
Threads296
Base clock speedno data3.65 GHz
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz4.8 GHz
Bus rate1600 MHzno data
L1 cache0 MB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography65 nm4 nm
Die sizeno data8x 70.6 mm2
Maximum core temperature95 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data66,520 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 and EPYC 9475F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data2
SocketSocket S1SP5
Power consumption (TDP)20 Watt400 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 and EPYC 9475F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP), MMX, PowerNow, SSE3,-64, Enhanced 3DNowno data
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
PowerNow+-
VirusProtect+-
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 and EPYC 9475F are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 and EPYC 9475F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 and EPYC 9475F.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Pros & cons summary

Recency 1 November 2009 10 October 2024
Physical cores 2 48
Threads 2 96
Chip lithography 65 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 20 Watt 400 Watt

Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 has 1900% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9475F, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 14 years, 2300% more physical cores and 4700% more threads, and a 1525% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 and EPYC 9475F. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 is a notebook processor while EPYC 9475F is a server/workstation one.

Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 and EPYC 9475F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

AMD Athlon 64 X2 TK-42
Athlon 64 X2 TK-42
AMD EPYC 9475F
EPYC 9475F
Like
Like

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 Athlon 64 X2 TK-42
vs
Celeron U3600 Celeron U3600
EPYC 9475F EPYC 9475F
vs
Atom S1220 Atom S1220
Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 Athlon 64 X2 TK-42
vs
Pentium Dual T2390 Pentium Dual Core T2390
Athlon 64 X2 TK-55 Athlon 64 X2 TK-55
vs
EPYC 9565 EPYC 9565
Turion II Neo K645 Turion II Neo K645
vs
EPYC 9455 EPYC 9455
Turion II Neo K645 Turion II Neo K645
vs
EPYC 9565 EPYC 9565
Turion II Neo K645 Turion II Neo K645
vs
EPYC 9655P EPYC 9655P
Turion II Neo K645 Turion II Neo K645
vs
EPYC 9755 EPYC 9755
Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 Athlon 64 X2 TK-42
vs
EPYC 9535 EPYC 9535
Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 Athlon 64 X2 TK-42
vs
EPYC 9555P EPYC 9555P
Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 Athlon 64 X2 TK-42
vs
EPYC 9575F EPYC 9575F
Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 Athlon 64 X2 TK-42
vs
EPYC 9565 EPYC 9565
Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 Athlon 64 X2 TK-42
vs
EPYC 9655 EPYC 9655

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.

3.3 8 votes

Rate Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9475F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 or EPYC 9475F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.