Opteron 3320 EE vs Athlon 64 X2 5800+
Primary details
Comparing Athlon 64 X2 5800+ and Opteron 3320 EE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 2324 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Power efficiency | no data | 4.56 |
| Architecture codename | Brisbane (2007−2008) | Delhi (2012−2013) |
| Release date | April 2008 (16 years ago) | 4 December 2012 (11 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Athlon 64 X2 5800+ and Opteron 3320 EE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 1.9 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
| L1 cache | 256 KB | 192 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 4096 KB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 8192 KB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 32 nm |
| Die size | 126 mm2 | 315 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 154 million | 1,200 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Athlon 64 X2 5800+ and Opteron 3320 EE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | AM2 | AM3+ |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 89 Watt | 25 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 64 X2 5800+ and Opteron 3320 EE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| FMA | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon 64 X2 5800+ and Opteron 3320 EE are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 64 X2 5800+ and Opteron 3320 EE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR3 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon 64 X2 5800+ and Opteron 3320 EE.
| PCIe version | no data | 2.0 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 2 | 4 |
| Threads | 2 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 32 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 89 Watt | 25 Watt |
Opteron 3320 EE has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 103.1% more advanced lithography process, and 256% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Athlon 64 X2 5800+ and Opteron 3320 EE. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Athlon 64 X2 5800+ is a desktop processor while Opteron 3320 EE is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 64 X2 5800+ and Opteron 3320 EE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
