Pentium G5600 vs Athlon 64 X2 5400+
Primary details
Comparing Athlon 64 X2 5400+ and Pentium G5600 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 2782 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Architecture codename | Windsor (2006−2007) | Coffee Lake (2017−2019) |
| Release date | December 2006 (17 years ago) | no data |
Detailed specifications
Athlon 64 X2 5400+ and Pentium G5600 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 2 | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 2.8 GHz | 3.9 GHz |
| L1 cache | 256 KB | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 256 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 6144 KB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 220 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 72 °C |
| Number of transistors | 154 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Athlon 64 X2 5400+ and Pentium G5600 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | AM2 | 1151 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 89 Watt | 51 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 64 X2 5400+ and Pentium G5600. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
Security technologies
Athlon 64 X2 5400+ and Pentium G5600 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon 64 X2 5400+ and Pentium G5600 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 64 X2 5400+ and Pentium G5600. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Pros & cons summary
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 89 Watt | 51 Watt |
Pentium G5600 has a 542.9% more advanced lithography process, and 74.5% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Athlon 64 X2 5400+ and Pentium G5600. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 64 X2 5400+ and Pentium G5600, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
