EPYC 9655P vs Athlon 64 X2 5400+

VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon 64 X2 5400+
2006
2 cores / 2 threads, 89 Watt
0.57
EPYC 9655P
2024
96 cores / 192 threads, 400 Watt
100.00
+17444%

EPYC 9655P outperforms Athlon 64 X2 5400+ by a whopping 17444% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Athlon 64 X2 5400+ and EPYC 9655P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking28301
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data2.62
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency0.6123.66
Architecture codenameWindsor (2006−2007)Turin (2024)
Release dateDecember 2006 (18 years ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$10,811

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Athlon 64 X2 5400+ and EPYC 9655P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)96
Threads2192
Base clock speedno data2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed2.8 GHz4.5 GHz
L1 cache256 KB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB384 MB (shared)
Chip lithography90 nm4 nm
Die size220 mm212x 70.6 mm2
Number of transistors154 million99,780 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 64 X2 5400+ and EPYC 9655P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM2SP5
Power consumption (TDP)89 Watt400 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 64 X2 5400+ and EPYC 9655P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon 64 X2 5400+ and EPYC 9655P are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 64 X2 5400+ and EPYC 9655P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon 64 X2 5400+ and EPYC 9655P.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon 64 X2 5400+ 0.57
EPYC 9655P 100.00
+17444%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon 64 X2 5400+ 907
EPYC 9655P 158845
+17413%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.57 100.00
Physical cores 2 96
Threads 2 192
Chip lithography 90 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 89 Watt 400 Watt

Athlon 64 X2 5400+ has 349.4% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9655P, on the other hand, has a 17443.9% higher aggregate performance score, 4700% more physical cores and 9500% more threads, and a 2150% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 9655P is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon 64 X2 5400+ in performance tests.

Note that Athlon 64 X2 5400+ is a desktop processor while EPYC 9655P is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 64 X2 5400+ and EPYC 9655P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon 64 X2 5400+
Athlon 64 X2 5400+
AMD EPYC 9655P
EPYC 9655P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 40 votes

Rate Athlon 64 X2 5400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 238 votes

Rate EPYC 9655P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon 64 X2 5400+ or EPYC 9655P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.