Turion X2 Ultra ZM-88 vs Athlon 64 X2 5000+

Primary details

Comparing Athlon 64 X2 5000+ and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-88 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking2843not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Architecture codenameWindsor (2006−2007)Griffin (2008−2009)
Release dateMay 2006 (18 years ago)December 2008 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Athlon 64 X2 5000+ and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-88 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Boost clock speed2.6 GHz2.5 GHz
L1 cache256 KB256 KB
L2 cache512 KB2 MB
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography90 nm65 nm
Die size220 mm2no data
Number of transistors154 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 64 X2 5000+ and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-88 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM2S1
Power consumption (TDP)89 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 64 X2 5000+ and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-88. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

PowerNow-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon 64 X2 5000+ and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-88 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 90 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 89 Watt 35 Watt

Turion X2 Ultra ZM-88 has a 38.5% more advanced lithography process, and 154.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Athlon 64 X2 5000+ and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-88. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Athlon 64 X2 5000+ is a desktop processor while Turion X2 Ultra ZM-88 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 64 X2 5000+ and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-88, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon 64 X2 5000+
Athlon 64 X2 5000+
AMD Turion X2 Ultra ZM-88
Turion X2 Ultra ZM-88

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 174 votes

Rate Athlon 64 X2 5000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 8 votes

Rate Turion X2 Ultra ZM-88 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon 64 X2 5000+ or Turion X2 Ultra ZM-88, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.