EPYC 9355P vs Athlon 64 X2 5000+ EE

VS

Primary details

Comparing Athlon 64 X2 5000+ EE and EPYC 9355P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Architecture codenameWindsor (2006−2007)Turin (2024)
Release dateSeptember 2006 (18 years ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$2,998

Detailed specifications

Athlon 64 X2 5000+ EE and EPYC 9355P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads264
Base clock speedno data3.55 GHz
Boost clock speed2.6 GHz4.4 GHz
L1 cache256K80 KB (per core)
L2 cache512K1 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography90 nm4 nm
Die size220 mm28x 70.6 mm2
Number of transistors154 million66,520 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 64 X2 5000+ EE and EPYC 9355P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM2SP5
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt280 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 64 X2 5000+ EE and EPYC 9355P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon 64 X2 5000+ EE and EPYC 9355P are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 64 X2 5000+ EE and EPYC 9355P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon 64 X2 5000+ EE and EPYC 9355P.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 2 32
Threads 2 64
Chip lithography 90 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 280 Watt

Athlon 64 X2 5000+ EE has 330.8% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9355P, on the other hand, has 1500% more physical cores and 3100% more threads, and a 2150% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Athlon 64 X2 5000+ EE and EPYC 9355P. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Athlon 64 X2 5000+ EE is a desktop processor while EPYC 9355P is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 64 X2 5000+ EE and EPYC 9355P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon 64 X2 5000+ EE
Athlon 64 X2 5000+ EE
AMD EPYC 9355P
EPYC 9355P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5
1 vote

Rate Athlon 64 X2 5000 EE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9355P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon 64 X2 5000+ EE or EPYC 9355P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.