Ryzen 5 3600X vs Athlon 64 X2 4800+

Aggregate performance score

Athlon 64 X2 4800+
2006
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.43
Ryzen 5 3600X
2019
6 cores / 12 threads, 95 Watt
11.45
+2563%

Ryzen 5 3600X outperforms Athlon 64 X2 4800+ by a whopping 2563% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Athlon 64 X2 (Desktop) 4800+ and Ryzen 5 3600X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2976690
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data18.87
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Series2x Athlon 64 (Desktop)AMD Ryzen 5
Power efficiency0.6311.41
Architecture codenameWindsor (2006−2007)Matisse (2019−2020)
Release dateno data7 July 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$249

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Athlon 64 X2 (Desktop) 4800+ and Ryzen 5 3600X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads212
Base clock speedno data3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz4.4 GHz
Bus rate1000 MHzno data
L1 cache256K96K (per core)
L2 cache512K512K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB32 MB (shared)
Chip lithography90 nm7 nm, 12 nm
Die size220 mm2no data
Number of transistors233 million4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 64 X2 (Desktop) 4800+ and Ryzen 5 3600X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
Socket939AM4
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 64 X2 (Desktop) 4800+ and Ryzen 5 3600X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon 64 X2 (Desktop) 4800+ and Ryzen 5 3600X are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 64 X2 (Desktop) 4800+ and Ryzen 5 3600X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory sizeno data128 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data51.196 GB/s

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon 64 X2 4800+ 0.43
Ryzen 5 3600X 11.45
+2563%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon 64 X2 4800+ 679
Ryzen 5 3600X 18185
+2578%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.43 11.45
Physical cores 2 6
Threads 2 12
Chip lithography 90 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 95 Watt

Athlon 64 X2 4800+ has 46.2% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 5 3600X, on the other hand, has a 2562.8% higher aggregate performance score, 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 1185.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 5 3600X is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon 64 X2 4800+ in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 64 X2 4800+ and Ryzen 5 3600X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon 64 X2 4800+
Athlon 64 X2 4800+
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X
Ryzen 5 3600X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 76 votes

Rate Athlon 64 X2 4800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 2807 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 3600X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon 64 X2 4800+ or Ryzen 5 3600X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.