Opteron 848 vs Athlon 64 X2 4800+
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3210 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Series | 2x Athlon 64 (Desktop) | no data |
| Power efficiency | 0.27 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Architecture codename | Windsor (2006−2007) | SledgeHammer (2003−2005) |
| Release date | no data | November 2003 (22 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Athlon 64 X2 (Desktop) 4800+ and Opteron 848 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Boost clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| Bus rate | 1000 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 256K | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 512K | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 130 nm |
| Die size | 220 mm2 | 193 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 233 million | 106 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Athlon 64 X2 (Desktop) 4800+ and Opteron 848 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 8 |
| Socket | 939 | 940 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 89 Watt |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 2 | 1 |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 130 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 89 Watt |
Athlon 64 X2 4800+ has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 44.4% more advanced lithography process, and 36.9% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between AMD Athlon 64 X2 4800+ and AMD Opteron 848. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Athlon 64 X2 4800+ is a desktop processor while Opteron 848 is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
