Athlon 64 FX-72 vs Athlon 64 X2 4800+

VS

Primary details

Comparing Athlon 64 X2 (Desktop) 4800+ and Athlon 64 FX-72 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated2381
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Series2x Athlon 64 (Desktop)no data
Power efficiencyno data0.85
Architecture codenameWindsor (2006−2007)Windsor (2006−2007)
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)November 2006 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Athlon 64 X2 (Desktop) 4800+ and Athlon 64 FX-72 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz2.8 GHz
Bus rate1000 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data128 KB
L2 cacheno data1 MB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography90 nm90 nm
Die sizeno data235 mm2
Number of transistorsno data227 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 64 X2 (Desktop) 4800+ and Athlon 64 FX-72 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
Socketno dataF
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt125 Watt

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 64 X2 (Desktop) 4800+ and Athlon 64 FX-72. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon 64 X2 4800+ 679
Athlon 64 FX-72 1794
+164%

Pros & cons summary


Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 125 Watt

Athlon 64 X2 4800+ has 92.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Athlon 64 X2 4800+ and Athlon 64 FX-72. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 64 X2 4800+ and Athlon 64 FX-72, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon 64 X2 4800+
Athlon 64 X2 4800+
AMD Athlon 64 FX-72
Athlon 64 FX-72

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 75 votes

Rate Athlon 64 X2 4800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 5 votes

Rate Athlon 64 FX-72 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon 64 X2 4800+ or Athlon 64 FX-72, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.