Ultra 5 226V vs Athlon 64 X2 4400+

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon 64 X2 4400+
2006
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.42
Core Ultra 5 226V
2024
8 cores / 8 threads, 17 Watt
11.99
+2755%

Core Ultra 5 226V outperforms Athlon 64 X2 4400+ by a whopping 2755% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Athlon 64 X2 (Desktop) 4400+ and Core Ultra 5 226V processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2980648
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Series2x Athlon 64 (Desktop)no data
Power efficiency0.6166.75
Architecture codenameWindsor (2006−2007)Lunar Lake (2024)
Release dateno data24 September 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

Athlon 64 X2 (Desktop) 4400+ and Core Ultra 5 226V basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads28
Base clock speedno data2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz4.5 GHz
Bus rate1000 MHz37 MHz
L1 cache256K192 KB (per core)
L2 cache512K2.5 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography90 nm3 nm
Die size220 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors233 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 64 X2 (Desktop) 4400+ and Core Ultra 5 226V compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
Socket939Intel BGA 2833
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 64 X2 (Desktop) 4400+ and Core Ultra 5 226V. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSX-+

Security technologies

Athlon 64 X2 (Desktop) 4400+ and Core Ultra 5 226V technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon 64 X2 (Desktop) 4400+ and Core Ultra 5 226V are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 64 X2 (Desktop) 4400+ and Core Ultra 5 226V. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataArc 130V

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon 64 X2 (Desktop) 4400+ and Core Ultra 5 226V.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data4

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon 64 X2 4400+ 0.42
Ultra 5 226V 11.99
+2755%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon 64 X2 4400+ 675
Ultra 5 226V 19038
+2720%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.42 11.99
Physical cores 2 8
Threads 2 8
Chip lithography 90 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 17 Watt

Ultra 5 226V has a 2754.8% higher aggregate performance score, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 2900% more advanced lithography process, and 282.4% lower power consumption.

The Core Ultra 5 226V is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon 64 X2 4400+ in performance tests.

Note that Athlon 64 X2 4400+ is a desktop processor while Core Ultra 5 226V is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 64 X2 4400+ and Core Ultra 5 226V, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon 64 X2 4400+
Athlon 64 X2 4400+
Intel Core Ultra 5 226V
Core Ultra 5 226V

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 140 votes

Rate Athlon 64 X2 4400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 7 votes

Rate Core Ultra 5 226V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon 64 X2 4400+ or Core Ultra 5 226V, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.