Celeron D 325 vs Athlon 64 X2 4400+

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Athlon 64 X2 (Desktop) 4400+ and Celeron D 325 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2981not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Series2x Athlon 64 (Desktop)no data
Power efficiency0.61no data
Architecture codenameWindsor (2006−2007)Prescott (2001−2005)
Release dateno dataJune 2004 (20 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Athlon 64 X2 (Desktop) 4400+ and Celeron D 325 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Base clock speedno data2.53 GHz
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz2.53 GHz
Bus rate1000 MHzno data
L1 cache256K16 KB
L2 cache512K256 KB
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography90 nm90 nm
Die size220 mm2109 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data67 °C
Number of transistors233 million125 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data1.25V-1.4V

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 64 X2 (Desktop) 4400+ and Celeron D 325 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
Socket939PPGA478
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt73 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 64 X2 (Desktop) 4400+ and Celeron D 325. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data-
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data-
Demand Based Switchingno data-
PAEno data32 Bit
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

Athlon 64 X2 (Desktop) 4400+ and Celeron D 325 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon 64 X2 (Desktop) 4400+ and Celeron D 325 are enumerated here.

VT-xno data-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 64 X2 (Desktop) 4400+ and Celeron D 325. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR1, DDR2, DDR3

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 73 Watt

Athlon 64 X2 4400+ has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and 12.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Athlon 64 X2 4400+ and Celeron D 325. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 64 X2 4400+ and Celeron D 325, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon 64 X2 4400+
Athlon 64 X2 4400+
Intel Celeron D 325
Celeron D 325

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 140 votes

Rate Athlon 64 X2 4400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 21 vote

Rate Celeron D 325 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon 64 X2 4400+ or Celeron D 325, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.