UHD Graphics 630 vs Athlon 64 X2 3800+

VS

Primary details

Comparing Athlon 64 X2 3800+ and UHD Graphics 630 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2998not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel UHD Graphics
Power efficiency0.43no data
Architecture codenameManchester (2005−2006)Gen9.5
Release dateAugust 2005 (19 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Athlon 64 X2 3800+ and UHD Graphics 630 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)no data
Threads2no data
Boost clock speed2 GHz0.35 GHz
L1 cache256Kno data
L2 cache512 KBno data
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography90 nm14 nm0.014 μm 1.4e-5 mm
Die size220 mm2no data
Number of transistors154 millionno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 64 X2 3800+ and UHD Graphics 630 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
Socket939no data
Power consumption (TDP)89 Wattno data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 64 X2 3800+ and UHD Graphics 630. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Maximum memory sizeno data65,536 MB 67,108,864 KB 68,719,476,736 B 0.0625 TiB 64 GB

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 90 nm 14 nm

UHD Graphics 630 has a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Athlon 64 X2 3800+ and UHD Graphics 630. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Athlon 64 X2 3800+ is a desktop processor while UHD Graphics 630 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 64 X2 3800+ and UHD Graphics 630, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon 64 X2 3800+
Athlon 64 X2 3800+
Intel UHD Graphics 630
UHD Graphics 630

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 94 votes

Rate Athlon 64 X2 3800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 91 vote

Rate UHD Graphics 630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon 64 X2 3800+ or UHD Graphics 630, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.