A8-5545M vs Athlon 64 X2 3800+

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Athlon 64 X2 3800+ and A8-5545M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot rated2350
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD A-Series
Architecture codenameManchester (2005−2006)Richland (2013−2014)
Release dateAugust 2005 (18 years ago)1 June 2013 (10 years ago)
Current price$86 $504

Detailed specifications

Athlon 64 X2 3800+ and A8-5545M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads24
Base clock speedno data1.7 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz2.7 GHz
L1 cache256K128 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography90 nm32 nm
Die size220 mm2246 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data71 °C
Number of transistors154 million1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 64 X2 3800+ and A8-5545M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
Socket939FP2
Power consumption (TDP)89 Watt25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 64 X2 3800+ and A8-5545M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno data86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMA, DDR3-1333 Controller
AES-NIno data+
FMAno data+
AVXno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon 64 X2 3800+ and A8-5545M are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 64 X2 3800+ and A8-5545M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon HD 8510G

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Athlon 64 X2 3800+ 629
A8-5545M 1543
+145%

A8-5545M outperforms Athlon 64 X2 3800+ by 145% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Athlon 64 X2 3800+ 203
A8-5545M 248
+22.2%

A8-5545M outperforms Athlon 64 X2 3800+ by 22% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Athlon 64 X2 3800+ 376
A8-5545M 557
+48.1%

A8-5545M outperforms Athlon 64 X2 3800+ by 48% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 90 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 89 Watt 25 Watt

We couldn't decide between Athlon 64 X2 3800+ and A8-5545M. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Athlon 64 X2 3800+ is a desktop processor while A8-5545M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 64 X2 3800+ and A8-5545M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon 64 X2 3800+
Athlon 64 X2 3800+
AMD A8-5545M
A8-5545M

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 91 vote

Rate Athlon 64 X2 3800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 24 votes

Rate A8-5545M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon 64 X2 3800+ or A8-5545M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.