Pentium 4 HT 530 vs Athlon 64 X2 3600+

VS

Primary details

Comparing Athlon 64 X2 3600+ and Pentium 4 HT 530 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3005not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency0.42no data
Architecture codenameManchester (2005−2006)Prescott (2001−2005)
Release date31 May 2005 (19 years ago)June 2004 (20 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Athlon 64 X2 3600+ and Pentium 4 HT 530 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads22
Boost clock speed2 GHz3 GHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)16 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)1 MB
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography90 nm90 nm
Die size156 mm2109 mm2
Number of transistors154 million125 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 64 X2 3600+ and Pentium 4 HT 530 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
Socket939775
Power consumption (TDP)89 Watt84 Watt

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 64 X2 3600+ and Pentium 4 HT 530. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1DDR1, DDR2, DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)no data

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 2 1
Power consumption (TDP) 89 Watt 84 Watt

Athlon 64 X2 3600+ has 100% more physical cores.

Pentium 4 HT 530, on the other hand, has 6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Athlon 64 X2 3600+ and Pentium 4 HT 530. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 64 X2 3600+ and Pentium 4 HT 530, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon 64 X2 3600+
Athlon 64 X2 3600+
Intel Pentium 4 HT 530
Pentium 4 HT 530

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 80 votes

Rate Athlon 64 X2 3600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.7 3 votes

Rate Pentium 4 HT 530 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon 64 X2 3600+ or Pentium 4 HT 530, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.