Xeon w9-3595X vs Athlon 64 TF-20
Aggregate performance score
Xeon w9-3595X outperforms Athlon 64 TF-20 by a whopping 39244% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Athlon 64 TF-20 and Xeon w9-3595X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3301 | 13 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 20.42 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | AMD Athlon 64 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 0.61 | 15.47 |
| Architecture codename | Sherman (2009) | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) |
| Release date | 1 May 2009 (15 years ago) | 24 August 2024 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $5,889 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Athlon 64 TF-20 and Xeon w9-3595X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 60 (Hexaconta-Core) |
| Performance-cores | no data | 60 |
| Threads | 1 | 120 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 4.8 GHz |
| Bus rate | 667 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 0.1 MB | 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 2 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 112.5 MB |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Die size | no data | 4x 477 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 95 °C | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 81 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Athlon 64 TF-20 and Xeon w9-3595X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | S1g1 | FCLGA4677 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 385 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 64 TF-20 and Xeon w9-3595X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | MMX, 3DNow!, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| VirusProtect | + | - |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Speed Shift | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
| Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | no data | + |
| Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
Security technologies
Athlon 64 TF-20 and Xeon w9-3595X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
| SGX | no data | - |
| OS Guard | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon 64 TF-20 and Xeon w9-3595X are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 64 TF-20 and Xeon w9-3595X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR5-4800 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 4 TB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 8 |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon 64 TF-20 and Xeon w9-3595X.
| PCIe version | no data | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 112 |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.16 | 62.95 |
| Recency | 1 May 2009 | 24 August 2024 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 60 |
| Threads | 1 | 120 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 385 Watt |
Athlon 64 TF-20 has 1440% lower power consumption.
Xeon w9-3595X, on the other hand, has a 39243.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 15 years, and 5900% more physical cores and 11900% more threads.
The Xeon w9-3595X is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon 64 TF-20 in performance tests.
Be aware that Athlon 64 TF-20 is a notebook processor while Xeon w9-3595X is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 64 TF-20 and Xeon w9-3595X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
