Celeron M 430 vs Athlon 64 TF-20

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon 64 TF-20
2009
1 core / 1 thread, 25 Watt
0.15
+50%

Athlon 64 TF-20 outperforms Celeron M 430 by an impressive 50% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking35433628
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Athlon 64Celeron M
Power efficiency0.250.16
DesignerAMDIntel
Architecture codenameSherman (2009)Yonah (2005−2006)
Release date1 May 2009 (16 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

Athlon 64 TF-20 and Celeron M 430 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads11
Base clock speedno data1.73 GHz
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz1.73 GHz
Bus rate667 MHz533 MHz
L1 cache0.1 MBno data
L2 cache512 KBno data
L3 cacheno data1 MB L2 KB
Chip lithography65 nm65 nm
Maximum core temperature95 °C100 °C
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data1.0V-1.3V

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 64 TF-20 and Celeron M 430 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketS1g1PPGA478
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt27 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 64 TF-20 and Celeron M 430. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, 3DNow!, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protectionno data
VirusProtect+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data-
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data-
Demand Based Switchingno data-
PAEno data32 Bit
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

Athlon 64 TF-20 and Celeron M 430 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon 64 TF-20 and Celeron M 430 are enumerated here.

VT-xno data-

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.15 0.10
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 27 Watt

Athlon 64 TF-20 has a 50% higher aggregate performance score, and 8% lower power consumption.

The AMD Athlon 64 TF-20 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Celeron M 430 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon 64 TF-20
Athlon 64 TF-20
Intel Celeron M 430
Celeron M 430

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 35 votes

Rate Athlon 64 TF-20 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 35 votes

Rate Celeron M 430 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Athlon 64 TF-20 and Celeron M 430, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.