EPYC 9655P vs Athlon 64 L110

VS

Primary details

Comparing Athlon 64 L110 and EPYC 9655P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated1
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data2.62
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesAMD Athlon 64no data
Power efficiencyno data23.66
Architecture codenameno dataTurin (2024)
Release date24 June 2009 (15 years ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$10,811

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Athlon 64 L110 and EPYC 9655P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)96
Threads1192
Base clock speedno data2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed1.2 GHz4.5 GHz
Bus rate800 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data80 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB1 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data384 MB (shared)
Chip lithographyno data4 nm
Die sizeno data12x 70.6 mm2
Number of transistorsno data99,780 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 64 L110 and EPYC 9655P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
Socketno dataSP5
Power consumption (TDP)no data400 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 64 L110 and EPYC 9655P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon 64 L110 and EPYC 9655P are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 64 L110 and EPYC 9655P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon 64 L110 and EPYC 9655P.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Pros & cons summary


Recency 24 June 2009 10 October 2024
Physical cores 1 96
Threads 1 192

EPYC 9655P has an age advantage of 15 years, and 9500% more physical cores and 19100% more threads.

We couldn't decide between Athlon 64 L110 and EPYC 9655P. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Athlon 64 L110 is a notebook processor while EPYC 9655P is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 64 L110 and EPYC 9655P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon 64 L110
Athlon 64 L110
AMD EPYC 9655P
EPYC 9655P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1 1 vote

Rate Athlon 64 L110 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 246 votes

Rate EPYC 9655P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon 64 L110 or EPYC 9655P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.