Atom C3508 vs Athlon 64 FX-76
Primary details
Comparing Athlon 64 FX-76 and Atom C3508 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | not rated | 2279 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Series | no data | Intel Atom |
| Architecture codename | Windsor (2006−2009) | Goldmont (2016−2017) |
| Release date | November 2006 (17 years ago) | 15 August 2017 (6 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Athlon 64 FX-76 and Atom C3508 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 1.6 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 224 KB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 8 MB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 8 MB |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 235 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 90 °C |
| Number of transistors | 227 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Athlon 64 FX-76 and Atom C3508 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | F | FCBGA1310 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 125 Watt | 11.5 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 64 FX-76 and Atom C3508. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| QuickAssist | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | - |
| Status | no data | Launched |
Security technologies
Athlon 64 FX-76 and Atom C3508 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| EDB | no data | + |
| Secure Boot | no data | + |
| Secure Key | no data | + |
| SGX | no data | - |
| OS Guard | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon 64 FX-76 and Atom C3508 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 64 FX-76 and Atom C3508. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR1 | DDR4: 1866 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 256 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 29.871 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | no data | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon 64 FX-76 and Atom C3508.
| PCIe version | no data | 3 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 8 |
| USB revision | no data | 3 |
| Total number of SATA ports | no data | 8 |
| Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports | no data | 8 |
| Number of USB ports | no data | 8 |
| Integrated LAN | no data | 4x2.5/1 GBE |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 2 | 4 |
| Threads | 2 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 125 Watt | 11 Watt |
We couldn't decide between Athlon 64 FX-76 and Atom C3508. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Athlon 64 FX-76 is a desktop processor while Atom C3508 is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 64 FX-76 and Atom C3508, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
