Pentium 967 vs Athlon 64 FX-74

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon 64 FX-74
2006
2 cores / 2 threads, 125 Watt
0.55
+52.8%

Athlon 64 FX-74 outperforms Pentium 967 by an impressive 53% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking30613263
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.010.01
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Pentium
Power efficiency0.190.90
DesignerAMDIntel
Manufacturerno dataIntel
Architecture codenameWindsor (2006−2007)Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Release dateNovember 2006 (19 years ago)2 October 2011 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$500$134

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Athlon 64 FX-74 and Pentium 967 have a nearly equal value for money.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Athlon 64 FX-74 and Pentium 967 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speedno data1.3 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz1.3 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 2.0
Bus rateno data4 × 5 GT/s
Multiplierno data13
L1 cache128 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB256K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB2 MB (shared)
Chip lithography90 nm32 nm
Die size235 mm2131 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors227 million504 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 64 FX-74 and Pentium 967 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFFCBGA1023
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 64 FX-74 and Pentium 967. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
FMA-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
My WiFino data-
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FDIno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+

Security technologies

Athlon 64 FX-74 and Pentium 967 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon 64 FX-74 and Pentium 967 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data-
VT-xno data-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 64 FX-74 and Pentium 967. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1DDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data16 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data21.335 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel Processors
Graphics max frequencyno data1 GHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Athlon 64 FX-74 and Pentium 967 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
SDVOno data+
CRTno data+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon 64 FX-74 and Pentium 967.

PCIe versionno data2.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Athlon 64 FX-74 0.55
+52.8%
Pentium 967 0.36

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Athlon 64 FX-74 972
+51.2%
Samples: 2
Pentium 967 643
Samples: 39

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.55 0.36
Chip lithography 90 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 17 Watt

Athlon 64 FX-74 has a 52.8% higher aggregate performance score.

Pentium 967, on the other hand, has a 181.3% more advanced lithography process, and 635.3% lower power consumption.

The AMD Athlon 64 FX-74 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Pentium 967 in performance tests.

Note that Athlon 64 FX-74 is a desktop processor while Pentium 967 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon 64 FX-74
Athlon 64 FX-74
Intel Pentium 967
Pentium 967

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 3 votes

Rate Athlon 64 FX-74 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.1 7 votes

Rate Pentium 967 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Athlon 64 FX-74 and Pentium 967, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.