A4-9120e SoC vs Athlon 64 FX-72
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2662 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Power efficiency | 0.35 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Manufacturer | no data | GlobalFoundries |
| Architecture codename | Windsor (2006−2007) | Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) |
| Release date | November 2006 (19 years ago) | 7 January 2019 (6 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Athlon 64 FX-72 and A4-9120e SoC basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 2 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 1.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.8 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 160 KB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB (shared) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 28 nm |
| Die size | 235 mm2 | 125 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 227 million | 1,200 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Athlon 64 FX-72 and A4-9120e SoC compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | F | FT4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 125 Watt | 6 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 64 FX-72 and A4-9120e SoC. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| FMA | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon 64 FX-72 and A4-9120e SoC are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 64 FX-72 and A4-9120e SoC. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR1 | DDR4 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Radeon R3 2CU |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon 64 FX-72 and A4-9120e SoC.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 8 |
Pros & cons summary
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 125 Watt | 6 Watt |
A4-9120e SoC has a 221.4% more advanced lithography process, and 1983.3% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between AMD Athlon 64 FX-72 and AMD A4-9120e SoC. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Athlon 64 FX-72 is a desktop processor while A4-9120e SoC is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
