Phenom II X4 B95 vs Athlon 64 FX-62

VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon 64 FX-62
2006
2 cores / 2 threads, 125 Watt
0.63
Phenom II X4 B95
2009
4 cores / 4 threads, 95 Watt
1.52
+141%

Phenom II X4 B95 outperforms Athlon 64 FX-62 by a whopping 141% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Athlon 64 (Desktop) FX-62 and Phenom II X4 B95 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking27872147
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data2.60
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesAthlon 64 (Desktop)no data
Power efficiency0.481.51
Architecture codenameWindsor (2006−2007)Deneb (2009−2011)
Release dateno data1 October 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$80

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Athlon 64 (Desktop) FX-62 and Phenom II X4 B95 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads24
Base clock speedno data3 GHz
Boost clock speed2.8 GHz3 GHz
Bus rate1000 MHzno data
L1 cache256 KB128 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB512 KB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography90 nm45 nm
Die size220 mm2258 mm2
Number of transistors243 million758 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 64 (Desktop) FX-62 and Phenom II X4 B95 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM2AM3
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt95 Watt

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon 64 (Desktop) FX-62 and Phenom II X4 B95 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 64 (Desktop) FX-62 and Phenom II X4 B95. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon 64 (Desktop) FX-62 and Phenom II X4 B95.

PCIe versionno data2.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon 64 FX-62 0.63
Phenom II X4 B95 1.52
+141%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon 64 FX-62 993
Phenom II X4 B95 2411
+143%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.63 1.52
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 90 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 95 Watt

Phenom II X4 B95 has a 141.3% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 31.6% lower power consumption.

The Phenom II X4 B95 is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon 64 FX-62 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 64 FX-62 and Phenom II X4 B95, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon 64 FX-62
Athlon 64 FX-62
AMD Phenom II X4 B95
Phenom II X4 B95

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 10 votes

Rate Athlon 64 FX-62 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 100 votes

Rate Phenom II X4 B95 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon 64 FX-62 or Phenom II X4 B95, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.