Pentium 4 HT 672 vs Athlon 64 FX-62

VS

Primary details

Comparing Athlon 64 (Desktop) FX-62 and Pentium 4 HT 672 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2771not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesAthlon 64 (Desktop)no data
Power efficiency0.48no data
Architecture codenameWindsor (2006−2007)Prescott (2001−2005)
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)November 2005 (19 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Athlon 64 (Desktop) FX-62 and Pentium 4 HT 672 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads22
Boost clock speed2.8 GHz3.8 GHz
Bus rate1000 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data28 KB
L2 cacheno data2 MB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography90 nm90 nm
Die sizeno data109 mm2
Number of transistorsno data169 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 64 (Desktop) FX-62 and Pentium 4 HT 672 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
Socketno data775
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt84 Watt

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 64 (Desktop) FX-62 and Pentium 4 HT 672. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR1, DDR2, DDR3

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 2 1
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 84 Watt

Athlon 64 FX-62 has 100% more physical cores.

Pentium 4 HT 672, on the other hand, has 48.8% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Athlon 64 FX-62 and Pentium 4 HT 672. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 64 FX-62 and Pentium 4 HT 672, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon 64 FX-62
Athlon 64 FX-62
Intel Pentium 4 HT 672
Pentium 4 HT 672

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 10 votes

Rate Athlon 64 FX-62 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 16 votes

Rate Pentium 4 HT 672 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon 64 FX-62 or Pentium 4 HT 672, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.