EPYC Embedded 3201 vs Athlon 64 FX-62
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3115 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Series | Athlon 64 (Desktop) | AMD EPYC Embedded |
| Power efficiency | 0.19 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Manufacturer | no data | GlobalFoundries |
| Architecture codename | Windsor (2006−2007) | Zen (2017−2020) |
| Release date | no data | 21 February 2018 (8 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Basic parameters of Athlon 64 (Desktop) FX-62 and EPYC Embedded 3201: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 1.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.8 GHz | 3.1 GHz |
| Bus rate | 1000 MHz | no data |
| Multiplier | no data | 15 |
| L1 cache | 256 KB | 96K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 512K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 16 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 220 mm2 | 213 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 243 million | 4,800 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Athlon 64 (Desktop) FX-62 and EPYC Embedded 3201 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | AM2 | AMD BGA SP4r2 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 125 Watt | 30 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 64 (Desktop) FX-62 and EPYC Embedded 3201. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon 64 (Desktop) FX-62 and EPYC Embedded 3201 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 64 (Desktop) FX-62 and EPYC Embedded 3201. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR1 | DDR4-2133 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 512 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 34.13 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon 64 (Desktop) FX-62 and EPYC Embedded 3201.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 32 |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 2 | 8 |
| Threads | 2 | 8 |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 125 Watt | 30 Watt |
EPYC Embedded 3201 has 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 543% more advanced lithography process, and 317% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between AMD Athlon 64 FX-62 and AMD EPYC Embedded 3201. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Athlon 64 FX-62 is a desktop processor while EPYC Embedded 3201 is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
