A10-6700 vs Athlon 64 FX-62

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon 64 FX-62
2006
2 cores / 2 threads, 2 Watt
0.56

A10-6700 outperforms Athlon 64 FX-62 by a whopping 214% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking30702215
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesAthlon 64 (Desktop)no data
Power efficiencyno data2.90
DesignerAMDAMD
Architecture codenameWindsor (2006−2007)Richland (2013−2014)
Release dateno data1 June 2013 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Athlon 64 (Desktop) FX-62 and A10-6700 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads24
Base clock speedno data3.7 GHz
Boost clock speed2.8 GHz4.3 GHz
Bus rate1000 MHzno data
L1 cache256 KB192 KB
L2 cache1 MB4096 KB
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography90 nm32 nm
Die size220 mm2246 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data71 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data71 °C
Number of transistors243 million1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 64 (Desktop) FX-62 and A10-6700 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM2FM2
Power consumption (TDP)2 MB65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 64 (Desktop) FX-62 and A10-6700. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
FMA-FMA4
AVX-AVX
PowerNow-+
PowerGating-+
VirusProtect-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon 64 (Desktop) FX-62 and A10-6700 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
IOMMU 2.0-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 64 (Desktop) FX-62 and A10-6700. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1DDR3-1866
Max memory channelsno data2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon HD 8670D
จำนวนพาธไลน์no data384
Enduro-+
Switchable graphics-+
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Athlon 64 (Desktop) FX-62 and A10-6700 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Athlon 64 (Desktop) FX-62 and A10-6700 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 11

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon 64 (Desktop) FX-62 and A10-6700.

PCIe versionno data2.0

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Athlon 64 FX-62 0.56
A10-6700 1.76
+214%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Athlon 64 FX-62 993
Samples: 22
A10-6700 3109
+213%
Samples: 802

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.56 1.76
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 90 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 2 Watt 65 Watt

Athlon 64 FX-62 has 3150% lower power consumption.

A10-6700, on the other hand, has a 214.3% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 181.3% more advanced lithography process.

The AMD A10-6700 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Athlon 64 FX-62 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon 64 FX-62
Athlon 64 FX-62
AMD A10-6700
A10-6700

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 12 votes

Rate Athlon 64 FX-62 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 293 votes

Rate A10-6700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Athlon 64 FX-62 and A10-6700, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.