Ryzen 3 8300G vs Athlon 64 FX-60

Aggregate performance score

Athlon 64 FX-60
2006
2 cores / 2 threads, 110 Watt
0.45
Ryzen 3 8300G
2024
4 cores / 8 threads, 65 Watt
9.01
+1902%

Ryzen 3 8300G outperforms Athlon 64 FX-60 by a whopping 1902% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Athlon 64 FX-60 and Ryzen 3 8300G processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2952854
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data32.47
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency0.3913.12
Architecture codenameToledo (2006)Phoenix2 (2024)
Release dateJanuary 2006 (18 years ago)8 January 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$176

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Athlon 64 FX-60 and Ryzen 3 8300G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads28
Base clock speedno data3.4 GHz
Boost clock speed2.6 GHz4.9 GHz
L1 cache128 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography90 nm4 nm
Die size199 mm2137 mm2
Number of transistors233 million20,900 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 64 FX-60 and Ryzen 3 8300G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
Socket939AM5
Power consumption (TDP)110 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 64 FX-60 and Ryzen 3 8300G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon 64 FX-60 and Ryzen 3 8300G are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 64 FX-60 and Ryzen 3 8300G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon 740M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon 64 FX-60 and Ryzen 3 8300G.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data14

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon 64 FX-60 0.45
Ryzen 3 8300G 9.01
+1902%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon 64 FX-60 709
Ryzen 3 8300G 14316
+1919%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.45 9.01
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 8
Chip lithography 90 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 110 Watt 65 Watt

Ryzen 3 8300G has a 1902.2% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 2150% more advanced lithography process, and 69.2% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 3 8300G is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon 64 FX-60 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 64 FX-60 and Ryzen 3 8300G, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon 64 FX-60
Athlon 64 FX-60
AMD Ryzen 3 8300G
Ryzen 3 8300G

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 10 votes

Rate Athlon 64 FX-60 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 10 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 8300G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon 64 FX-60 or Ryzen 3 8300G, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.