Opteron X2 290 vs Athlon 64 FX-60
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3217 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Power efficiency | 0.15 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Architecture codename | Toledo (2006) | Italy (2005−2006) |
| Release date | January 2006 (19 years ago) | 1 January 2006 (19 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Athlon 64 FX-60 and Opteron X2 290 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 2 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.8 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.6 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 128 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 90 nm |
| Die size | 199 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 233 million | 233 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Athlon 64 FX-60 and Opteron X2 290 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 2 |
| Socket | 939 | 940 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 110 Watt | 95 Watt |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 64 FX-60 and Opteron X2 290. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR1 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon 64 FX-60 and Opteron X2 290.
| PCIe version | no data | 2.0 |
Pros & cons summary
| Power consumption (TDP) | 110 Watt | 95 Watt |
Opteron X2 290 has 15.8% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between AMD Athlon 64 FX-60 and AMD Opteron X2 290. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Athlon 64 FX-60 is a desktop processor while Opteron X2 290 is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
