Pentium 4 2.80 vs Athlon 64 3600+

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon 64 3600+
2004
1 core / 1 thread, 89 Watt
0.34
+143%

Athlon 64 3600+ outperforms Pentium 4 2.80 by a whopping 143% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking32983585
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency0.160.05
DesignerAMDIntel
Architecture codenameClawhammer (2001−2005)Northwood (2002−2004)
Release dateJune 2004 (21 years ago)August 2002 (23 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Athlon 64 3600+ and Pentium 4 2.80 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads11
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz2.79 GHz
L1 cache128K8 KB
L2 cache1 MB512 KB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography130 nm130 nm
Die size193 mm2146 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)70 °Cno data
Number of transistors106 million55 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 64 3600+ and Pentium 4 2.80 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
Socket754478
Power consumption (TDP)89 Watt110 Watt

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 64 3600+ and Pentium 4 2.80. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1DDR1, DDR2

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Athlon 64 3600+ 0.34
+143%
Pentium 4 2.80 0.14

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Athlon 64 3600+ 601
+150%
Pentium 4 2.80 240
Samples: 490

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.34 0.14
Power consumption (TDP) 89 Watt 110 Watt

Athlon 64 3600+ has a 142.9% higher aggregate performance score, and 23.6% lower power consumption.

The AMD Athlon 64 3600+ is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Pentium 4 2.80 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon 64 3600+
Athlon 64 3600+
Intel Pentium 4 2.80
Pentium 4 2.80

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 3 votes

Rate Athlon 64 3600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 120 votes

Rate Pentium 4 2.80 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Athlon 64 3600+ and Pentium 4 2.80, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.