FX-7600P vs Athlon 64 3600+

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon 64 3600+
2004
1 core / 1 thread, 89 Watt
0.34

FX-7600P outperforms Athlon 64 3600+ by a whopping 326% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking33202374
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Kaveri
Power efficiency0.414.45
DesignerAMDAMD
Manufacturerno dataGlobalFoundries
Architecture codenameClawhammer (2001−2005)Kaveri (2014−2015)
Release dateJune 2004 (21 years ago)4 June 2014 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Athlon 64 3600+ and FX-7600P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads14
Base clock speedno data2.7 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz3.6 GHz
Bus rateno dataBGA (FP3)
L1 cache128Kno data
L2 cache1 MB4096 KB
Chip lithography130 nm28 nm
Die size193 mm2245 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)70 °Cno data
Number of transistors106 million2,410 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 64 3600+ and FX-7600P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
Socket754FP3
Power consumption (TDP)89 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 64 3600+ and FX-7600P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno data86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMA
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
FRTC-+
TrueAudio-+
PowerNow-+
PowerGating-+
Out-of-band client management-+
VirusProtect-+
HSA-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon 64 3600+ and FX-7600P are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
IOMMU 2.0-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 64 3600+ and FX-7600P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1DDR3-2133
Max memory channelsno data2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon R7 Graphics
iGPU core countno data8
Enduro-+
Switchable graphics-+
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Athlon 64 3600+ and FX-7600P integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Athlon 64 3600+ and FX-7600P integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 12
Vulkan-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon 64 3600+ and FX-7600P.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data8

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Athlon 64 3600+ 0.34
FX-7600P 1.45
+326%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Athlon 64 3600+ 601
FX-7600P 2557
+325%
Samples: 140

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.34 1.45
Physical cores 1 4
Threads 1 4
Chip lithography 130 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 89 Watt 35 Watt

FX-7600P has a 326.5% higher aggregate performance score, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 364.3% more advanced lithography process, and 154.3% lower power consumption.

The AMD FX-7600P is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Athlon 64 3600+ in performance tests.

Note that Athlon 64 3600+ is a desktop processor while FX-7600P is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon 64 3600+
Athlon 64 3600+
AMD FX-7600P
FX-7600P

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 3 votes

Rate Athlon 64 3600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 12 votes

Rate FX-7600P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Athlon 64 3600+ and FX-7600P, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.