Celeron M 333 vs Athlon 64 3500+
Primary details
Comparing Athlon 64 3500+ and Celeron M 333 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3182 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Celeron M |
| Power efficiency | 0.26 | no data |
| Architecture codename | San Diego (2001−2005) | Banias (2003) |
| Release date | January 2001 (23 years ago) | no data |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $59 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Athlon 64 3500+ and Celeron M 333 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 1 |
| Boost clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 0.9 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 400 MHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | no data |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | no data |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 130 nm |
| Die size | 230 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 227 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Athlon 64 3500+ and Celeron M 333 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | 939 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 89 Watt | 5 Watt |
Pros & cons summary
| Power consumption (TDP) | 89 Watt | 5 Watt |
Celeron M 333 has 1680% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Athlon 64 3500+ and Celeron M 333. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Athlon 64 3500+ is a desktop processor while Celeron M 333 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 64 3500+ and Celeron M 333, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
