Athlon 64 3200+ vs Athlon 64 3300+

VS

Primary details

Comparing Athlon 64 3300+ and Athlon 64 3200+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Architecture codenameNewCastle (2004)Clawhammer (2001−2005)
Release dateApril 2004 (20 years ago)January 2001 (23 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$150

Detailed specifications

Athlon 64 3300+ and Athlon 64 3200+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads11
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz2 GHz
L1 cache128 KB128 KB
L2 cache256 KB512K
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography130 nm130 nm
Die size144 mm2193 mm2
Number of transistors105 million154 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 64 3300+ and Athlon 64 3200+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
Socket754754
Power consumption (TDP)89 Watt89 Watt

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon 64 3300+ 375
+23%
Athlon 64 3200+ 305

Pros & cons summary


We couldn't decide between Athlon 64 3300+ and Athlon 64 3200+. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 64 3300+ and Athlon 64 3200+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon 64 3300+
Athlon 64 3300+
AMD Athlon 64 3200+
Athlon 64 3200+

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Athlon 64 3300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 91 vote

Rate Athlon 64 3200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon 64 3300+ or Athlon 64 3200+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.