Xeon W-3323 vs Athlon 64 3000+

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon 64 3000+
2001
1 core / 1 thread, 89 Watt
0.21
Xeon W-3323
2021
12 cores / 24 threads, 220 Watt
17.52
+8243%

Xeon W-3323 outperforms Athlon 64 3000+ by a whopping 8243% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Athlon 64 3000+ and Xeon W-3323 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3218362
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency0.227.53
Architecture codenameClawhammer (2001−2005)Ice Lake-W (2021)
Release dateJanuary 2001 (23 years ago)29 July 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$65no data

Detailed specifications

Athlon 64 3000+ and Xeon W-3323 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads124
Base clock speedno data3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz3.9 GHz
Bus rateno data8 GT/s
L1 cache128 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache512K1 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB18 MB (shared)
Chip lithography130 nm10 nm
Die size193 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data84 °C
Number of transistors154 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 64 3000+ and Xeon W-3323 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
Socket754FCLGA4189
Power consumption (TDP)89 Watt220 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 64 3000+ and Xeon W-3323. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Athlon 64 3000+ and Xeon W-3323 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon 64 3000+ and Xeon W-3323 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 64 3000+ and Xeon W-3323. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4-3200
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TB
Max memory channelsno data8
ECC memory support-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon 64 3000+ and Xeon W-3323.

PCIe versionno data4
PCI Express lanesno data64

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon 64 3000+ 0.21
Xeon W-3323 17.52
+8243%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon 64 3000+ 334
Xeon W-3323 27822
+8230%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.21 17.52
Physical cores 1 12
Threads 1 24
Chip lithography 130 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 89 Watt 220 Watt

Athlon 64 3000+ has 147.2% lower power consumption.

Xeon W-3323, on the other hand, has a 8242.9% higher aggregate performance score, 1100% more physical cores and 2300% more threads, and a 1200% more advanced lithography process.

The Xeon W-3323 is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon 64 3000+ in performance tests.

Note that Athlon 64 3000+ is a desktop processor while Xeon W-3323 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 64 3000+ and Xeon W-3323, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon 64 3000+
Athlon 64 3000+
Intel Xeon W-3323
Xeon W-3323

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 117 votes

Rate Athlon 64 3000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 21 vote

Rate Xeon W-3323 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon 64 3000+ or Xeon W-3323, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.