Athlon XP-M 1400+ vs Athlon 64 3000+

VS

Primary details

Comparing Athlon 64 3000+ and Athlon XP-M 1400+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Athlon XP-M
Architecture codenameClawhammer (2001−2005)K7 (2000−2004)
Release dateJanuary 2001 (23 years ago)12 March 2003 (21 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$65$71

Detailed specifications

Athlon 64 3000+ and Athlon XP-M 1400+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads11
Boost clock speed2 GHz1.2 GHz
Bus typeno dataFSB
Bus rateno data200 MT/s
Multiplierno data12
L1 cache128 KB128 KB
L2 cache512K256 KB
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography130 nm130 nm
Die size193 mm285 mm2
Number of transistors154 million37 Million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 64 3000+ and Athlon XP-M 1400+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
Socket754Socket 563
Power consumption (TDP)89 Watt25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 64 3000+ and Athlon XP-M 1400+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

PowerNow-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 64 3000+ and Athlon XP-M 1400+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Maximum memory sizeno data4 GB

Pros & cons summary


Power consumption (TDP) 89 Watt 25 Watt

Athlon XP-M 1400+ has 256% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Athlon 64 3000+ and Athlon XP-M 1400+. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Athlon 64 3000+ is a desktop processor while Athlon XP-M 1400+ is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 64 3000+ and Athlon XP-M 1400+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon 64 3000+
Athlon 64 3000+
AMD Athlon XP-M 1400+
Athlon XP-M 1400+

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 112 votes

Rate Athlon 64 3000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Athlon XP-M 1400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon 64 3000+ or Athlon XP-M 1400+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.