Athlon XP-M 1400+ vs Athlon 64 3000+
Primary details
Comparing Athlon 64 3000+ and Athlon XP-M 1400+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3208 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | no data | AMD Athlon XP-M |
| Power efficiency | 0.22 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Clawhammer (2001−2005) | K7 (2000−2004) |
| Release date | January 2001 (23 years ago) | 12 March 2003 (21 year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $65 | $71 |
Detailed specifications
Athlon 64 3000+ and Athlon XP-M 1400+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 1 |
| Boost clock speed | 2 GHz | 1.2 GHz |
| Bus type | no data | FSB |
| Bus rate | no data | 266 MT/s |
| Multiplier | no data | 9 |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 512K | 256 KB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 130 nm |
| Die size | 193 mm2 | 85 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 154 million | 37 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Athlon 64 3000+ and Athlon XP-M 1400+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | 754 | Socket 563 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 89 Watt | 25 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 64 3000+ and Athlon XP-M 1400+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| PowerNow | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 64 3000+ and Athlon XP-M 1400+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Maximum memory size | no data | 4 GB |
Pros & cons summary
| Power consumption (TDP) | 89 Watt | 25 Watt |
Athlon XP-M 1400+ has 256% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Athlon 64 3000+ and Athlon XP-M 1400+. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Athlon 64 3000+ is a desktop processor while Athlon XP-M 1400+ is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 64 3000+ and Athlon XP-M 1400+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
