Processor N95 vs Athlon 64 2800+

VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon 64 2800+
2004
1 core / 1 thread, 89 Watt
0.19
Processor N95
2023
4 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
3.15
+1558%

Processor N95 outperforms Athlon 64 2800+ by a whopping 1558% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Athlon 64 2800+ and Processor N95 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking32401611
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Alder Lake-N
Power efficiencyno data19.87
Architecture codenameNewCastle (2004)Alder Lake-N (2023)
Release dateApril 2004 (20 years ago)3 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$100no data

Detailed specifications

Athlon 64 2800+ and Processor N95 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads14
Base clock speedno data0.1 GHz
Boost clock speed1.8 GHz3.4 GHz
L1 cache128 KB96 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB2 MB (shared)
L3 cache0 KB6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography130 nm10 nm
Die size193 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Number of transistors69 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 64 2800+ and Processor N95 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
Socket754Intel BGA 1264
Power consumption (TDP)89 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 64 2800+ and Processor N95. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+

Security technologies

Athlon 64 2800+ and Processor N95 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon 64 2800+ and Processor N95 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 64 2800+ and Processor N95. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4, DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon 64 2800+ and Processor N95.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data9

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.19 3.15
Physical cores 1 4
Threads 1 4
Chip lithography 130 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 89 Watt 15 Watt

Processor N95 has a 1557.9% higher aggregate performance score, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 1200% more advanced lithography process, and 493.3% lower power consumption.

The Processor N95 is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon 64 2800+ in performance tests.

Note that Athlon 64 2800+ is a desktop processor while Processor N95 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 64 2800+ and Processor N95, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon 64 2800+
Athlon 64 2800+
Intel Processor N95
Processor N95

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 36 votes

Rate Athlon 64 2800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 691 vote

Rate Processor N95 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon 64 2800+ or Processor N95, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.