EPYC 7453 vs Athlon 64 2650e

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Athlon 64 2650e and EPYC 7453 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot rated109
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data21.33
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Seriesno dataAMD EPYC
Architecture codenameLima (2008−2009)Milan (2021)
Release dateJanuary 2009 (15 years ago)15 March 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,570
Current price$34 $1525 (1x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Athlon 64 2650e and EPYC 7453 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)28 (Octacosa-Core)
Threads156
Base clock speedno data2.75 GHz
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz3.45 GHz
L1 cache128 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB512 KB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB64 MB (shared)
Chip lithography65 nm7 nm+
Die size77 mm24x 81 mm2
Number of transistors122 million16,600 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 64 2650e and EPYC 7453 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketAM2SP3
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt225 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 64 2650e and EPYC 7453. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NIno data+
AVXno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon 64 2650e and EPYC 7453 are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 64 2650e and EPYC 7453. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4-3200
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TiB
Maximum memory bandwidthno data204.795 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon 64 2650e and EPYC 7453.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 28
Threads 1 56
Chip lithography 65 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 225 Watt

We couldn't decide between Athlon 64 2650e and EPYC 7453. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Athlon 64 2650e is a desktop processor while EPYC 7453 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 64 2650e and EPYC 7453, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon 64 2650e
Athlon 64 2650e
AMD EPYC 7453
EPYC 7453

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 28 votes

Rate Athlon 64 2650e on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 7453 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon 64 2650e or EPYC 7453, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.