Celeron 2955U vs Athlon 64 2650e
Primary details
Comparing Athlon 64 2650e and Celeron 2955U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | not rated | 2825 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
Series | no data | Intel Celeron |
Power efficiency | no data | 3.47 |
Architecture codename | Lima (2008−2009) | Haswell (2013−2015) |
Release date | 1 January 2009 (15 years ago) | 1 September 2013 (11 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Athlon 64 2650e and Celeron 2955U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
Threads | 1 | 2 |
Base clock speed | no data | 1.4 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 1.4 GHz |
Bus rate | no data | 5 GT/s |
L1 cache | 128 KB | 64K (per core) |
L2 cache | 512 KB | 256K (per core) |
L3 cache | 0 KB | 2 MB (shared) |
Chip lithography | 65 nm | 22 nm |
Die size | 77 mm2 | 118 mm2 |
Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 105 °C |
Number of transistors | 122 million | 1,400 million |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Athlon 64 2650e and Celeron 2955U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Socket | AM2 | FCBGA1168 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 64 2650e and Celeron 2955U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | - |
Idle States | no data | + |
Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
Smart Response | no data | - |
GPIO | no data | + |
Smart Connect | no data | + |
FDI | no data | - |
AMT | no data | 9.5 |
Matrix Storage | no data | - |
HD Audio | no data | + |
RST | no data | + |
Security technologies
Athlon 64 2650e and Celeron 2955U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | no data | - |
EDB | no data | + |
Secure Key | no data | + |
OS Guard | no data | - |
Anti-Theft | no data | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon 64 2650e and Celeron 2955U are enumerated here.
AMD-V | - | + |
VT-d | no data | - |
VT-x | no data | + |
EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 64 2650e and Celeron 2955U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR2 | DDR3 |
Maximum memory size | no data | 16 GB |
Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 25.6 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Intel® HD Graphics for 4th Generation Intel® Processors |
Clear Video | no data | + |
Graphics max frequency | no data | 1 GHz |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Athlon 64 2650e and Celeron 2955U integrated GPUs.
Number of displays supported | no data | 3 |
eDP | no data | + |
DisplayPort | - | + |
HDMI | - | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon 64 2650e and Celeron 2955U.
PCIe version | 2.0 | 2.0 |
PCI Express lanes | no data | 10 |
PCI support | no data | - |
USB revision | no data | 3.0 |
Total number of SATA ports | no data | 2 |
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports | no data | 2 |
Integrated IDE | no data | - |
Number of USB ports | no data | 4 |
Integrated LAN | no data | - |
UART | no data | + |
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 1 January 2009 | 1 September 2013 |
Physical cores | 1 | 2 |
Threads | 1 | 2 |
Chip lithography | 65 nm | 22 nm |
Celeron 2955U has an age advantage of 4 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 195.5% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Athlon 64 2650e and Celeron 2955U. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Athlon 64 2650e is a desktop processor while Celeron 2955U is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 64 2650e and Celeron 2955U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.