Athlon Gold 7220C vs Athlon 64 2000+
Primary details
Comparing Athlon 64 2000+ and Athlon Gold 7220C processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3370 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | no data | AMD Mendocino (Zen 2, Ryzen 7020) |
| Power efficiency | 1.18 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Lima (2008−2009) | Mendocino (Zen 2) (2022−2023) |
| Release date | June 2008 (16 years ago) | 23 May 2023 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Athlon 64 2000+ and Athlon Gold 7220C basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 1 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.4 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 4 MB |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 6 nm |
| Die size | 77 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 122 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Athlon 64 2000+ and Athlon Gold 7220C compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | AM2 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 8 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 64 2000+ and Athlon Gold 7220C. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon 610M ( - 1900 MHz) |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 1 | 2 |
| Threads | 1 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 6 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 8 Watt | 15 Watt |
Athlon 64 2000+ has 87.5% lower power consumption.
Athlon Gold 7220C, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 983.3% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Athlon 64 2000+ and Athlon Gold 7220C. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Athlon 64 2000+ is a desktop processor while Athlon Gold 7220C is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 64 2000+ and Athlon Gold 7220C, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
