i9-13900F vs Athlon 5370

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon 5370
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 25 Watt
1.08
Core i9-13900F
2023
24 cores / 32 threads, 65 Watt
27.88
+2481%

Core i9-13900F outperforms Athlon 5370 by a whopping 2481% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2598204
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data55.73
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency1.8318.17
DesignerAMDIntel
ManufacturerGlobalFoundriesIntel
Architecture codenameKabini (2013−2014)Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
Release date9 April 2014 (11 years ago)4 January 2023 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$524

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Athlon 5370 and Core i9-13900F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Performance-coresno data8
Efficient-coresno data16
Threads432
Base clock speed2.2 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz5.5 GHz
L1 cache256 KB80K (per core)
L2 cache2048 KB2 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data36 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size107 mm2257 mm2
Maximum core temperature76 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)90 °C72 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data+

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 5370 and Core i9-13900F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM1FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 5370 and Core i9-13900F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
FMAFMA4-
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Athlon 5370 and Core i9-13900F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon 5370 and Core i9-13900F are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 5370 and Core i9-13900F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1600DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200
Maximum memory sizeno data192 GB
Max memory channels12
Maximum memory bandwidthno data89.6 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R3 Graphicsno data
จำนวนพาธไลน์128no data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Athlon 5370 and Core i9-13900F integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Athlon 5370 and Core i9-13900F integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon 5370 and Core i9-13900F.

PCIe version2.05.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanes424

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Athlon 5370 1.08
i9-13900F 27.88
+2481%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Athlon 5370 1906
Samples: 39
i9-13900F 49114
+2477%
Samples: 389

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.08 27.88
Recency 9 April 2014 4 January 2023
Physical cores 4 24
Threads 4 32
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 65 Watt

Athlon 5370 has 160% lower power consumption.

i9-13900F, on the other hand, has a 2481.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, and 500% more physical cores and 700% more threads.

The Intel Core i9-13900F is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Athlon 5370 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon 5370
Athlon 5370
Intel Core i9-13900F
Core i9-13900F

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 14 votes

Rate Athlon 5370 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 190 votes

Rate Core i9-13900F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Athlon 5370 and Core i9-13900F, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.