Atom D525 vs Athlon 5150

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Athlon 5150 and Atom D525 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking2516not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Atom
Architecture codenameKabini (2013−2014)Pinetrail (2009−2011)
Release date9 April 2014 (10 years ago)21 June 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$63

Detailed specifications

Athlon 5150 and Atom D525 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads44
Base clock speedno data1.8 GHz
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz1.8 GHz
L1 cache256 KB112 KB
L2 cache2048 KB1 MB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography28 nm45 nm
Die size107 mm287 mm2
Maximum core temperature76 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)90 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data176 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 5150 and Atom D525 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM1FCBGA559
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt13 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 5150 and Atom D525. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3
AES-NI+-
FMAFMA4-
AVX+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
VirusProtect+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data-
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Idle Statesno data-
Demand Based Switchingno data-
PAEno data32 Bit
Statusno dataDiscontinued

Security technologies

Athlon 5150 and Atom D525 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon 5150 and Atom D525 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data-
VT-xno data-
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 5150 and Atom D525. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1600DDR2, DDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data4 GB
Max memory channels11
Maximum memory bandwidthno data6.4 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R3 GraphicsIntel GMA 3150
Number of pipelines128no data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Athlon 5150 and Atom D525 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Athlon 5150 and Atom D525 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon 5150 and Atom D525.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes4no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon 5150 1388
+245%
Atom D525 402

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Athlon 5150 173
+125%
Atom D525 77

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Athlon 5150 476
+155%
Atom D525 187

Pros & cons summary


Recency 9 April 2014 21 June 2010
Physical cores 4 2
Chip lithography 28 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 13 Watt

Athlon 5150 has an age advantage of 3 years, 100% more physical cores, and a 60.7% more advanced lithography process.

Atom D525, on the other hand, has 92.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Athlon 5150 and Atom D525. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Athlon 5150 is a desktop processor while Atom D525 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 5150 and Atom D525, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon 5150
Athlon 5150
Intel Atom D525
Atom D525

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 45 votes

Rate Athlon 5150 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 202 votes

Rate Atom D525 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon 5150 or Atom D525, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.