Xeon 6737P vs Athlon 300U

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon 300U
2019
2 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
2.20
Xeon 6737P
2025
32 cores / 64 threads, 270 Watt
45.31
+1960%

Xeon 6737P outperforms Athlon 300U by a whopping 1960% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking199460
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesAMD Athlonno data
Power efficiency6.207.09
DesignerAMDIntel
ManufacturerGlobalFoundriesno data
Architecture codenameRaven Ridge 2 (2019)no data
Release date6 January 2019 (6 years ago)1 January 2025 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

Athlon 300U and Xeon 6737P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads464
Base clock speed2.4 GHz2.9 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz4 GHz
Bus typePCIe 3.0no data
Multiplier24no data
L1 cache128K (per core)no data
L2 cache512K (per core)no data
L3 cache4 MB (shared)144 MB
Chip lithography14 nmIntel 3 nm
Die size209.78 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data82 °C
Number of transistors4940 Millionno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 300U and Xeon 6737P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketFP5FCLGA4710
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt270 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 300U and Xeon 6737P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512, Intel® AMX
AES-NI++
AVX+-
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Athlon 300U and Xeon 6737P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon 300U and Xeon 6737P are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 300U and Xeon 6737P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR5(6400MT/s)
Maximum memory size64 GB4 TB
Max memory channels28
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon RX Vega 3 ( - 1000 MHz)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon 300U and Xeon 6737P.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes1288

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Athlon 300U 2.20
Xeon 6737P 45.31
+1960%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Athlon 300U 3862
Samples: 136
Xeon 6737P 79634
+1962%
Samples: 2

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.20 45.31
Recency 6 January 2019 1 January 2025
Physical cores 2 32
Threads 4 64
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 270 Watt

Athlon 300U has 1700% lower power consumption.

Xeon 6737P, on the other hand, has a 1959.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, and 1500% more physical cores and 1500% more threads.

The Intel Xeon 6737P is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Athlon 300U in performance tests.

Be aware that Athlon 300U is a notebook processor while Xeon 6737P is a server/workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon 300U
Athlon 300U
Intel Xeon 6737P
Xeon 6737P

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 507 votes

Rate Athlon 300U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon 6737P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Athlon 300U and Xeon 6737P, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.