Ryzen Threadripper 7970X vs Athlon 300U

VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon 300U
2019
2 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
2.53
Ryzen Threadripper 7970X
2023
32 cores / 64 threads, 350 Watt
64.43
+2447%

Ryzen Threadripper 7970X outperforms Athlon 300U by a whopping 2447% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Athlon 300U and Ryzen Threadripper 7970X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking175313
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data20.57
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Athlonno data
Power efficiency15.3816.79
Architecture codenameRaven Ridge 2 (2019)Storm Peak (2023)
Release date6 January 2019 (5 years ago)19 October 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$2,499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Athlon 300U and Ryzen Threadripper 7970X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads464
Base clock speed2.4 GHz4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz5.3 GHz
Bus typePCIe 3.0no data
Multiplier24no data
L1 cache192 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB (shared)128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm5 nm
Die size209.78 mm24x 71 mm2
Number of transistors4940 Million26,280 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 300U and Ryzen Threadripper 7970X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFP5sTR5
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt350 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 300U and Ryzen Threadripper 7970X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTno data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon 300U and Ryzen Threadripper 7970X are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 300U and Ryzen Threadripper 7970X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR5
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon RX Vega 3N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon 300U and Ryzen Threadripper 7970X.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes1248

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon 300U 2.53
Ryzen Threadripper 7970X 64.43
+2447%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon 300U 3867
Ryzen Threadripper 7970X 98605
+2450%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.53 64.43
Recency 6 January 2019 19 October 2023
Physical cores 2 32
Threads 4 64
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 350 Watt

Athlon 300U has 2233.3% lower power consumption.

Ryzen Threadripper 7970X, on the other hand, has a 2446.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, 1500% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen Threadripper 7970X is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon 300U in performance tests.

Be aware that Athlon 300U is a notebook processor while Ryzen Threadripper 7970X is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 300U and Ryzen Threadripper 7970X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon 300U
Athlon 300U
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 7970X
Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 457 votes

Rate Athlon 300U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 41 vote

Rate Ryzen Threadripper 7970X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon 300U or Ryzen Threadripper 7970X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.