A8-7670K vs Athlon 300U

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon 300U
2019
2 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
2.53
+21.1%

Athlon 300U outperforms A8-7670K by a significant 21% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Athlon 300U and A8-7670K processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking17521912
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Athlonno data
Power efficiency15.382.01
Architecture codenameRaven Ridge 2 (2019)Godaveri (2014−2016)
Release date6 January 2019 (5 years ago)20 July 2015 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Athlon 300U and A8-7670K basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed2.4 GHz3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz3.9 GHz
Bus typePCIe 3.0no data
Multiplier24no data
L1 cache192 KB256 KB
L2 cache1 MB4096 KB
L3 cache4 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography14 nm28 nm
Die size209.78 mm2245 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data72 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors4940 Million2,411 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 300U and A8-7670K compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFP5FM2+
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 300U and A8-7670K. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTno data
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
FRTC-+
FreeSync-+
PowerTune-+
DualGraphics-+
TrueAudio-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon 300U and A8-7670K are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 300U and A8-7670K. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR3-2133
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon RX Vega 3AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
iGPU core countno data6
Number of pipelinesno data512
Enduro-+
Switchable graphics-+
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Athlon 300U and A8-7670K integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Athlon 300U and A8-7670K integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 12
Vulkan-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon 300U and A8-7670K.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes1216

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon 300U 2.53
+21.1%
A8-7670K 2.09

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon 300U 3867
+21.1%
A8-7670K 3192

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.53 2.09
Recency 6 January 2019 20 July 2015
Physical cores 2 4
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 95 Watt

Athlon 300U has a 21.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 533.3% lower power consumption.

A8-7670K, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores.

The Athlon 300U is our recommended choice as it beats the A8-7670K in performance tests.

Be aware that Athlon 300U is a notebook processor while A8-7670K is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 300U and A8-7670K, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon 300U
Athlon 300U
AMD A8-7670K
A8-7670K

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 457 votes

Rate Athlon 300U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 5 votes

Rate A8-7670K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon 300U or A8-7670K, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.