Xeon 698X vs Athlon 3000G

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1981not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.27no data
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesAMD Athlonno data
Power efficiency3.06no data
DesignerAMDIntel
Manufacturerno dataIntel
Architecture codenameZen+ (2018−2019)Granite Rapids (2024−2026)
Release date21 November 2019 (6 years ago)2 February 2026 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)$49$7,699

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Athlon 3000G and Xeon 698X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)86
Performance-coresno data86
Threads4172
Base clock speed3.5 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz4.8 GHz
Bus typePCIe 3.0no data
Bus rateno data0 GT/s
Multiplier35no data
L1 cache96K (per core)112 KB (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB (shared)336 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nmIntel 3 nm
Die size209.78 mm2?2x 598 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data79 °C
Number of transistors4,800 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier++

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 3000G and Xeon 698X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketAM4FCLGA4710
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt350 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 3000G and Xeon 698X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
PowerNow+-
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Precision Boost 2+no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Athlon 3000G and Xeon 698X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon 3000G and Xeon 698X are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 3000G and Xeon 698X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR5(6400MT/s)MRDIMM(8000MT/s)
Maximum memory size64 GB?4 TB
Max memory channelsno data8
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon Vega 3N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon 3000G and Xeon 698X.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes6128

Pros & cons summary


Recency 21 November 2019 2 February 2026
Physical cores 2 86
Threads 4 172
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 350 Watt

Athlon 3000G has 900% lower power consumption.

Xeon 698X, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, and 4200% more physical cores and 4200% more threads.

We couldn't decide between AMD Athlon 3000G and Intel Xeon 698X. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Athlon 3000G is a desktop processor while Xeon 698X is a server/workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon 3000G
Athlon 3000G
Intel Xeon 698X
Xeon 698X

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 2307 votes

Rate Athlon 3000G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon 698X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Athlon 3000G and Xeon 698X, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.