Opteron 1352 (B2) vs Athlon 3000G
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1931 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 5.27 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Workstation |
| Series | AMD Athlon | no data |
| Power efficiency | 3.06 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Architecture codename | Zen+ (2018−2019) | Budapest (2008) |
| Release date | 21 November 2019 (5 years ago) | 3 June 2008 (17 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $49 | $209 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Athlon 3000G and Opteron 1352 (B2) basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 3.5 GHz | 2.1 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.5 GHz | 2.1 GHz |
| Bus type | PCIe 3.0 | no data |
| Multiplier | 35 | no data |
| L1 cache | 96K (per core) | 128 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 4 MB (shared) | 2 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 65 nm |
| Die size | 209.78 mm2? | 285 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 4,800 million | 463 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Athlon 3000G and Opteron 1352 (B2) compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | AM4 | AM2+ |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 95 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 3000G and Opteron 1352 (B2). You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| PowerNow | + | - |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon 3000G and Opteron 1352 (B2) are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 3000G and Opteron 1352 (B2). Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 Dual-channel | DDR2 |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB? | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 42.671 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon Vega 3 | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon 3000G and Opteron 1352 (B2).
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 2.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 6 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 21 November 2019 | 3 June 2008 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 65 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 95 Watt |
Athlon 3000G has an age advantage of 11 years, a 364.3% more advanced lithography process, and 171.4% lower power consumption.
Opteron 1352 (B2), on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores.
We couldn't decide between AMD Athlon 3000G and AMD Opteron 1352 (B2). We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Athlon 3000G is a desktop processor while Opteron 1352 (B2) is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
