EPYC 74F3 vs Athlon 3000G

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon 3000G
2019
2 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
2.90
EPYC 74F3
2021
24 cores / 48 threads, 240 Watt
39.22
+1252%

EPYC 74F3 outperforms Athlon 3000G by a whopping 1252% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Athlon 3000G and EPYC 74F3 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking158466
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation11.0212.17
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesAMD AthlonAMD EPYC
Architecture codenameZen+ (2018−2020)Milan (2021)
Release date21 November 2019 (4 years ago)15 March 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$49$2,900
Current price$110 (2.2x MSRP)$2990 (1x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 74F3 has 10% better value for money than Athlon 3000G.

Detailed specifications

Athlon 3000G and EPYC 74F3 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads448
Base clock speed3.5 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz4 GHz
L1 cache96K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB (shared)256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm+
Die size209.78 mm2?4x 81 mm2
Number of transistors4,800 million33,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierYesYes

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 3000G and EPYC 74F3 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2
SocketAM4SP3
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt240 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 3000G and EPYC 74F3. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
PowerNow+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon 3000G and EPYC 74F3 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 3000G and EPYC 74F3. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR4-3200
Maximum memory size64 GB?4 TiB
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/s204.795 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon RX Vega 3N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon 3000G and EPYC 74F3.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes6128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon 3000G 2.90
EPYC 74F3 39.22
+1252%

EPYC 74F3 outperforms Athlon 3000G by 1252% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Athlon 3000G 4489
EPYC 74F3 60666
+1251%

EPYC 74F3 outperforms Athlon 3000G by 1251% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.90 39.22
Recency 21 November 2019 15 March 2021
Physical cores 2 24
Threads 4 48
Cost $49 $2900
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 240 Watt

The EPYC 74F3 is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon 3000G in performance tests.

Note that Athlon 3000G is a desktop processor while EPYC 74F3 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 3000G and EPYC 74F3, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon 3000G
Athlon 3000G
AMD EPYC 74F3
EPYC 74F3

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 2005 votes

Rate Athlon 3000G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate EPYC 74F3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon 3000G or EPYC 74F3, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.