EPYC 9175F vs Athlon 240GE

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Athlon 240GE and EPYC 9175F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1659not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.42no data
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesAMD Athlonno data
Power efficiency7.71no data
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)Turin (2024)
Release date6 September 2018 (6 years ago)10 October 2024 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)$75$4,256

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Athlon 240GE and EPYC 9175F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads432
Base clock speed3.5 GHz4.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz5 GHz
Multiplier35no data
L1 cache192 KB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB (shared)512 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm4 nm
Die size209.78 mm216x 70.6 mm2
Number of transistors4950 Million133,040 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 240GE and EPYC 9175F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2
SocketAM4SP5
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt320 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 240GE and EPYC 9175F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon 240GE and EPYC 9175F are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 240GE and EPYC 9175F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR5
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon RX Vega 3N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon 240GE and EPYC 9175F.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes12128

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 September 2018 10 October 2024
Physical cores 2 16
Threads 4 32
Chip lithography 14 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 320 Watt

Athlon 240GE has 814.3% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9175F, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, 700% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Athlon 240GE and EPYC 9175F. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Athlon 240GE is a desktop processor while EPYC 9175F is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 240GE and EPYC 9175F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon 240GE
Athlon 240GE
AMD EPYC 9175F
EPYC 9175F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 60 votes

Rate Athlon 240GE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9175F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon 240GE or EPYC 9175F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.