Ultra 7 265KF vs Athlon 240GE

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon 240GE
2018
2 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
2.85
Core Ultra 7 265KF
2024
20 cores / 20 threads, 125 Watt
37.07
+1201%

Core Ultra 7 265KF outperforms Athlon 240GE by a whopping 1201% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Athlon 240GE and Core Ultra 7 265KF processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking167689
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.4297.72
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Athlonno data
Power efficiency7.7028.05
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
Release date21 December 2018 (6 years ago)24 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$75$379

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ultra 7 265KF has 2757% better value for money than Athlon 240GE.

Detailed specifications

Athlon 240GE and Core Ultra 7 265KF basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)20 (Icosa-Core)
Threads420
Base clock speed3.5 GHz3.9 GHz
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz5.5 GHz
Multiplier35no data
L1 cache96K (per core)112 KB (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)3 MB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB (shared)30 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm3 nm
Die size209.78 mm2243 mm2
Number of transistors4,800 million17,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 240GE and Core Ultra 7 265KF compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketAM41851
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 240GE and Core Ultra 7 265KF. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSX-+
Precision Boost 2+no data

Security technologies

Athlon 240GE and Core Ultra 7 265KF technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon 240GE and Core Ultra 7 265KF are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 240GE and Core Ultra 7 265KF. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR5
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon Vega 3N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon 240GE and Core Ultra 7 265KF.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes1220

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon 240GE 2.85
Ultra 7 265KF 37.07
+1201%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon 240GE 4527
Ultra 7 265KF 58883
+1201%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.85 37.07
Recency 21 December 2018 24 October 2024
Physical cores 2 20
Threads 4 20
Chip lithography 14 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 125 Watt

Athlon 240GE has 257.1% lower power consumption.

Ultra 7 265KF, on the other hand, has a 1200.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, 900% more physical cores and 400% more threads, and a 366.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Core Ultra 7 265KF is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon 240GE in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 240GE and Core Ultra 7 265KF, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon 240GE
Athlon 240GE
Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF
Core Ultra 7 265KF

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 60 votes

Rate Athlon 240GE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 38 votes

Rate Core Ultra 7 265KF on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon 240GE or Core Ultra 7 265KF, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.