i5-9500F vs Athlon 220GE

VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon 220GE
2018
2 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
2.79
Core i5-9500F
2019
6 cores / 6 threads, 65 Watt
6.25
+124%

Core i5-9500F outperforms Athlon 220GE by a whopping 124% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Athlon 220GE and Core i5-9500F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking16881081
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.0810.46
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesAMD AthlonIntel Core i5
Power efficiency7.549.10
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)Coffee Lake (2017−2019)
Release date1 June 2018 (6 years ago)23 April 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$65$192

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i5-9500F has 156% better value for money than Athlon 220GE.

Detailed specifications

Athlon 220GE and Core i5-9500F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads46
Base clock speed3.4 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz4.4 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 3.0
Bus rateno data4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplier3430
L1 cache96K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)256K (per core)
L3 cache4 MB (shared)9 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size209.78 mm2149 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors4,800 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 220GE and Core i5-9500F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketAM4FCLGA1151
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 220GE and Core i5-9500F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
TSX-+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Precision Boost 2+no data

Security technologies

Athlon 220GE and Core i5-9500F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
MPX-+
Identity Protection-+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon 220GE and Core i5-9500F are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 220GE and Core i5-9500F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR4-2666
Maximum memory size64 GB128 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/s42.671 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon Vega 3-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon 220GE and Core i5-9500F.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes1216

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon 220GE 2.79
i5-9500F 6.25
+124%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon 220GE 4432
i5-9500F 9930
+124%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.79 6.25
Recency 1 June 2018 23 April 2019
Physical cores 2 6
Threads 4 6
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 65 Watt

Athlon 220GE has 85.7% lower power consumption.

i5-9500F, on the other hand, has a 124% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 months, and 200% more physical cores and 50% more threads.

The Core i5-9500F is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon 220GE in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 220GE and Core i5-9500F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon 220GE
Athlon 220GE
Intel Core i5-9500F
Core i5-9500F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 49 votes

Rate Athlon 220GE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 167 votes

Rate Core i5-9500F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon 220GE or Core i5-9500F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.